muscle injury (ad)1148/radiol.2017160267/asset/images/medium/radiol.2017160267.fig14.gif”>
In this manuscript, (Understanding Muscle Injuries: The Role of Imaging), we will elaborate on the forms and imaging methods for diagnosis of muscle injuries. X-rays are good for finding broken bones but not soft tissue injuries like muscle tears. In this connection, the preeminent imaging tool for evaluating muscle injuries is not ultrasound but rather Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) because it can provide finely detailed views of soft tissues.
The Limitations of X-rays
X-Rays target bone structure and do not view soft tissue damage which includes muscular tears. They are valuable for the exclusion of fractures however they can not release on muscular injuries being acute and also reveal depth or personality. You must undergo a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) when muscle damage is suspected in order to confirm and know the location of its intensity.
The Advantages of MRI
MRI has higher contrast resolution and improved multiplanar image capability, thus depicting the soft tissue lesions better. It provides healthcare providers with details on how much muscle was injured, can differentiate between injury types such as strains or tears and track the healing process. MRI can also show things such as edema and new scar tissue formation, which helps determine treatment plans & rehab timelienes.
Clinical Implications
An MRI may be necessary for those with known or suspected muscle injury, especially in athletes and symptomatic patients not responding to conservative treatments. Specialist imaging and MRI may also preprocess the nature of Injury which in turn, would be helpful predicting times to recovery and reducing performing re-injury risks. Therefore, while X rays are useful in initial assessments; MRI is still the gold standard for complete evaluation of muscle injuries.
